#8 Proposal to remove multiple input/output rules.

Offen
vor 7 Jahren geöffnet von claudio · 1 Kommentare
claudio kommentierte vor 7 Jahren

I think we don't need to use multiple input/output rules. One rule block seems to be enough for the cases we are dealing with, and simplifies the generated code. Also, the current semantic adaptation framework does not cope with this well because it can create duplicate of the rules for execution (executing too many rules redundantly).

I think we don't need to use multiple input/output rules. One rule block seems to be enough for the cases we are dealing with, and simplifies the generated code. Also, the current semantic adaptation framework does not cope with this well because it can create duplicate of the rules for execution (executing too many rules redundantly).
casper kommentierte vor 7 Jahren
Mitarbeiter

Hi Claudio, I guess we have to check whether the rule already exists or not in line 231.

Other than that, I am trying to write up particularly when the mapIn rules and mapOut rules should be run, such that they can be called correctly.

Hi Claudio, I guess we have to check whether the rule already exists or not in [line 231](https://github.com/into-cps/hybridCosimulation-framework/blob/master/semantic-adaptation/src/SemanticAdaptation.h#L231). Other than that, I am trying to write up particularly when the mapIn rules and mapOut rules should be run, such that they can be called correctly.
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
2 Beteiligte
Laden…
Abbrechen
Speichern
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.